Тактику предоставили trogdor
20
20
Average rating: |
4.6 |
Ratings: |
17 |
Your vote: |
|
Creator |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Теги
Filter strategies:
These options reset all other sorting filters. |
||||||||||
1 | скрипт |
2 | 5.0 | 40 | 73
1:13
|
10 | ||||
2 | скрипт |
2 | 4.9 | 103 | 135
2:15
|
18 | ||||
3 |
The Enchanted Tuskling will use either Ethereal or Expunge on round 1, then use them on CD from there. If they use Expunge first this strategy will be 10 rounds. If they use Ethereal first it will be 12.
Video for Fight |
Порода скрипт |
2 | 4.9 | 46 | 85
1:25
|
10-12 | |||
4 | скрипт |
2 | 4.6 | 20 | 84
1:24
|
11+ | ||||
5 |
Script thanks to Calipso
|
скрипт |
2 | 4.7 | 8 | 91
1:31
|
12+ | |||
6 | скрипт |
2 | 4.4 | 11 | 73
1:13
|
10-11 | ||||
7 |
Любой уровень 1+ Питомец
|
Случайности Уровень 1+ скрипт |
2 | 4.0 | 11 | 155
2:35
|
18+ | |||
8 |
Fast and easy, enjoy :)
------------------------ Fight time: 14-15 rounds ------------------------ |
2 | 5.0 | 2 | 103
1:43
|
14-15 | ||||
9 |
Don't have all the Железная звездочка Breeds, so I could only test the more powerful ones and therefore set a Power requirement. I prefer those with less HP.
|
Порода скрипт |
2 | 4.8 | 5 | 92
1:32
|
12 | |||
10 | 2 | 4.7 | 1 | 122
2:02
|
16 | |||||
11 |
Modified:
Now; 9 rounds, ~1:10 2nd pet must be Dragon |
Порода скрипт |
2 | 4.5 | 0 | 80
1:20
|
10+ | |||
12 |
Had success with either a PS or PP Железная звездочка
It seems like sometimes Железная звездочка will die a round early, this doesn't change much it will just mean adding a second Выжженная земля with Firewing, and maybe a second Коготь дикого зверя to finish the fight |
Случайности скрипт |
2 | 2.3 | 1 | 114
1:54
|
14+ | |||
13 | скрипт |
2 | 0.0 | 0 | 84
1:24
|
10-11 |
Вкл. шаги:
Способности: 2 * *
Порода: Любой
Порода | Health | Power | Speed |
---|---|---|---|
HH | 1806 | 276 | 227 |
PS | 1481 | 305 | 257 |
Substitutes:
1 / 2
1 / 6
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
For the best display of your strategy, please follow these guidelines:
Pretty inflammable attitude right there
1
Вы должны войти в систему, чтобы голосовать за комментарииmraymus
написал на 2023-11-05 20:46:19
1
Вы должны войти в систему, чтобы голосовать за комментарииCoffe#21587
написал на 2023-07-24 15:54:27
1
Вы должны войти в систему, чтобы голосовать за комментарииTessriel
написал на 2023-04-01 08:41:42
This strategy can fail if Lord Flappinsby gets a crit off.(edited)2
Вы должны войти в систему, чтобы голосовать за комментарии(OP) trogdor
написал на 2023-04-01 17:12:39
1
Вы должны войти в систему, чтобы голосовать за комментарииGráinne
написал на 2023-04-01 20:20:38
As a practical matter, it's a PITA to calculate the fail chance of a given strat. You can do it, but most people don't. So the site doesn't have an objective standard for what needs an RNG tag. I'm inclined to think it should depend on the difficulty of the battle.
My own mental guideline in the early days was that a normal WQ type strat definitely needs an RNG tag when its fail chance is 5% or more, and an awkward challenge-type battle, like Family, has more leeway.
But as a few people have become much more experienced and savvy about validating and testing strats, the expected standard has been raised. When I see a strat from Mutanis or DragonsAfterDark or Lazey or a handful of others, I know that any fail chance is going to be less than I'm ever likely to notice.
2
Вы должны войти в систему, чтобы голосовать за комментарии(OP) trogdor
написал на 2023-04-15 05:51:06
Is it bad form to update this strat with a new pet after publishing? Should I make yet another strat instead? @Aranesh
2
Вы должны войти в систему, чтобы голосовать за комментарииGráinne
написал на 2023-04-15 12:48:17
The only downside that I see - and this is not just confined to your strat - is that when I look at the full list of strats above, I see almost the same pets in every strat, in the same pattern.
So the site isn't providing a lot of variation on this one :)
But that is not your problem, as a indivisual strat creator.
Новый комментарий: